The compact crossover segment continues to evolve, and the 2025 Mazda CX-30 stands out for its blend of dynamic performance and aesthetic appeal. As potential buyers evaluate options, understanding the Mazda CX-30 Competitors becomes essential. With a base engine delivering 191 horsepower and impressive interior features like the Mazda Connect infotainment system, the CX-30 positions itself as a compelling choice among crossover SUV alternatives. However, it’s crucial to delve into a crossover SUV comparison to uncover the top rivals Mazda CX-30 may face in the marketplace, including notable models such as the Subaru Crosstrek, Hyundai Kona, and Honda HR-V. Each of these alternatives offers unique attributes that can sway purchasing decisions. This article will explore the capabilities of the Mazda CX-30 in conjunction with its competitors, arming buyers with the necessary insights to make an informed decision.
Key Takeaways
- The 2025 Mazda CX-30 offers a robust engine with up to 250 horsepower using a turbocharged option.
- Safety features include eight airbags, with accolades such as the 2024 IIHS TOP SAFETY PICK+ award.
- Interior space is generous, with up to 94.1 cubic feet of passenger space, making it competitive in its class.
- Key competitors, including Subaru Crosstrek and Hyundai Kona, have varying levels of performance and features.
- Understanding performance comparisons can significantly aid buyers in selecting the right crossover SUV.
Introduction to the Mazda CX-30 and Its Market Standing
The Mazda CX-30 has emerged as a prominent player in the compact SUV sales arena since its introduction in 2019. This vehicle, built on the fourth-generation Mazda3 platform, successfully integrates aesthetics, performance, and technology. The Mazda CX-30 overview highlights a distinctive appeal, characterized by an upscale interior and engaging driving dynamics that attract both consumers and automotive critics alike.
Positioned competitively among entry-level sub-compact crossover SUVs, the CX-30 continues to challenge established rivals such as the Subaru Crosstrek. The engaging drive experience and refined cabin make it an attractive option for buyers seeking both function and style. With strong consumer acceptance evident since launch, the CX-30 has become one of the top-sellers in its segment.
The market position of the CX-30 reflects its success, having ranked among the best-selling SUVs in its class. Although Mazda has experienced declines in overall brand popularity, the CX-30 remains a reliable choice for many shoppers. The 2025 model year is anticipated to sustain this momentum, ensuring that the Mazda CX-30 continues to capture the attention of consumers.
| Feature | Details |
|---|---|
| First Manufactured | 2019 |
| Seating Capacity | 5 occupants |
| Model Year Range | 2020 onward |
| Engine Type | 2.5-litre inline 4-cylinder |
| Maximum Power | 139kW at 6000rpm |
| Market Positioning | Top-Selling Compact SUV |
| Fuel Efficiency | 6.6L per 100km (combined) |
| Cargo Volume | 317 litres (up to 1479 litres with seats down) |
| Current Price Range | $30,090 to $48,190 (plus on-road costs) |
| Towing Capacity | 1200kg (braked) |
Understanding the Compact Crossover Segment
The compact crossover market continues to experience robust growth, driven by changing consumer preferences. Young professionals and families increasingly favor vehicles that combine versatility with efficiency. This segment has become highly competitive as brands respond to evolving SUV trends, showcasing features that align with buyer expectations.
In the current landscape, fuel efficiency ranks high on the list of consumer preferences. Automakers are focusing on developing vehicles that not only offer great performance but also minimize environmental impact. This shift reflects a collective desire among buyers for energy-efficient options that align with eco-conscious lifestyles.
Safety features are another critical aspect influencing the compact crossover market. Consumers prioritize advanced safety technologies, such as automated emergency braking, lane-keeping assistance, and adaptive cruise control. These features enhance driving confidence, making compact crossovers desirable choices for families and individuals alike.
- Growing focus on:
- Fuel efficiency
- Advanced safety features
- Technology integration
As the compact crossover segment evolves, automakers like Mazda design vehicles such as the Mazda CX-30 to meet these demands. By understanding these trends and consumer preferences, manufacturers can create models that resonate with buyers and succeed in the dynamic compact crossover market.
Key Features of the 2025 Mazda CX-30
The 2025 Mazda CX-30 stands out in the compact crossover segment, combining exceptional performance specs, luxurious interior comfort, and top-notch safety features. With a careful blend of these attributes, it continues to impress both drivers and critics alike.
Performance Specifications
The Mazda CX-30 offers impressive performance specs that cater to varying driving preferences. The base engine delivers 191 horsepower, providing ample power for daily commutes and weekend getaways. For those seeking more thrill, the available turbocharged engine ramps up this output to 250 horsepower, accompanied by 320 lb-ft of torque. This level of performance aligns with Mazda CX-30 reviews that highlight its dynamic driving experience. Fuel efficiency remains competitive, with the standard model achieving 26 MPG in the city and 33 MPG on the highway.
Interior Comfort and Technology
Step inside the 2025 Mazda CX-30 to discover a thoughtfully designed cabin featuring high-quality materials and spacious dimensions. With 94.1 cubic feet of passenger space and 20.2 cubic feet of cargo capacity, the interior comfortably accommodates both passengers and their belongings. For tech enthusiasts, the Mazda CX-30 features advanced interior technology, including the Mazda Connect infotainment system, which comes standard with an 8.8-inch screen, upgradeable to 10.25 inches for enhanced usability. Furthermore, offerings like Mazda Radar Cruise Control and lane-keep assist ensure a modern driving experience.
Safety Ratings and Awards
Safety remains a top priority for Mazda. The 2025 Mazda CX-30 has achieved the prestigious TOP SAFETY PICK+ award from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) for the year 2024, demonstrating a commitment to the highest safety standards. Equipped with eight airbags and advanced protective technologies, this vehicle not only promises peace of mind but has earned accolades for its robust safety features. With its blend of innovative Mazda CX-30 features and reputable safety ratings, it appeals to families and safety-conscious drivers alike.
Mazda CX-30 Competitors in 2025
As the compact SUV market continues to evolve, the Mazda CX-30 faces robust competition from several notable rivals. Understanding the landscape of Mazda CX-30 competitors is essential for potential buyers seeking the best crossover alternatives.
Key contenders in the compact SUV segment include:
- Subaru Crosstrek: Known for its rugged capability, the Crosstrek features a base engine producing 152 horsepower, significantly less than the CX-30’s base engine that delivers 191 horsepower. Its overall appeal lies in its off-road capabilities, making it a strong option for outdoor enthusiasts.
- Hyundai Kona: The Kona’s base engine generates 190 horsepower, slightly lower than the CX-30. However, the Kona offers unique design features and practical technology, appealing to younger buyers. The CX-30’s performance edge comes from its turbocharged engine option, producing up to 250 horsepower.
- Honda HR-V: This model provides slightly more cargo space than the CX-30, but it may fall short regarding the upscale interior atmosphere and sporty performance the CX-30 offers. The HR-V remains a reliable choice for those prioritizing practicality over luxury.
The Mazda CX-30 asserts itself within compact SUV comparisons as a well-rounded vehicle, offering 94.1 cubic feet of passenger space and a refined interior. Its advanced safety features, including the i-ACTIVSENSE suite with adaptive cruise control and lane-keeping assist, set it apart in safety ratings. With a 2024 Insurance Institute for Highway Safety TOP SAFETY PICK+ award, the CX-30 emphasizes its commitment to passenger safety.
In summary, buyers looking at the Mazda CX-30 benefits from exploring its competitors and evaluating key specifications and features. Knowing the differences between these compact SUVs and their crossover alternatives allows for more informed purchasing decisions.
Comparative Analysis: Mazda CX-30 vs. Subaru Crosstrek
The Mazda CX-30 and Subaru Crosstrek stand out in the compact crossover market, each offering unique qualities appealing to different types of drivers. A performance analysis reveals notable differences in power and dynamics, while an interior comparison highlights contrasting design philosophies and comfort levels.
Performance Comparison
The performance aspect rates highly when comparing the Mazda CX-30 vs Subaru Crosstrek. The Mazda CX-30 features a standard 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine delivering 191 horsepower, which significantly outshines the Crosstrek’s base engine, a 2.0-liter flat-four producing only 152 horsepower. This power disparity leads to better acceleration and an overall more engaging driving experience in the CX-30. For those seeking even more power, a turbocharged engine option in the CX-30 offers up to 250 horsepower, providing a remarkable boost in performance.
| Model | Engine Type | Horsepower | Torque (lb-ft) | Fuel Economy (City/Highway) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mazda CX-30 | 2.5L 4-cylinder | 191 hp | 186 lb-ft | 26/33 mpg |
| Subaru Crosstrek | 2.0L flat-4 | 152 hp | 145 lb-ft | 27/34 mpg |
Interior Quality and Comfort
When considering the interior comparison, the Mazda CX-30’s cabin stands out for its upscale materials and sophisticated design, offering a more luxurious feel than the Subaru Crosstrek. The CX-30 integrates advanced technology seamlessly, featuring an 8-speaker audio system compared to Crosstrek’s 4-speaker setup, delivering a richer sound experience. While both vehicles provide comfort for passengers, the CX-30 leans more towards refined aesthetics, while the Crosstrek emphasizes practicality and ruggedness.
- Mazda CX-30: 20.2 cubic feet of trunk capacity; valued for refined aesthetics and modern technology.
- Subaru Crosstrek: 19.9 cubic feet of trunk capacity; praised for rugged styling and practicality.
The intricacies in performance and interior design between the Mazda CX-30 and Subaru Crosstrek reveal clear distinctions that cater to different consumer preferences. Understanding these differences enhances the decision-making process for potential buyers exploring compact crossovers.
Mazda CX-30 vs. Hyundai Kona: A Detailed Look
In the compact crossover market, the Mazda CX-30 and Hyundai Kona stand out as compelling options. This analysis focuses on key aspects of the Mazda CX-30 Hyundai Kona comparison, highlighting engine performance and interior space.
Engine Power and Efficiency
The engine performance of the Mazda CX-30 showcases its dominance in this comparison. Equipped with a turbo engine producing 250 horsepower and 320 lb-ft of torque, it surpasses the Hyundai Kona N Line, which features a 1.6L turbo engine with only 195 horsepower. The Mazda’s power allows for a 0-60 MPH acceleration in just 5.8 seconds, making it a sporty choice for enthusiasts.
When it comes to fuel economy, the Hyundai Kona has its strengths. The Kona achieves up to 32 MPG combined in front-wheel drive and 29 MPG with all-wheel drive, offering a more efficient option compared to the Mazda CX-30’s turbo engine, which delivers 25 MPG combined. The naturally aspirated AWD version of the CX-30 provides slightly better efficiency at 26 MPG combined but still lags behind the Kona.
Interior Features and Cargo Space
In terms of interior space, the Mazda CX-30 is designed for a luxurious feel with premium materials, giving it a sophisticated ambiance. It also provides 20 cubic feet of trunk cargo space. While the Hyundai Kona offers a spacious cabin, it cannot match the overall refinement of the CX-30’s interior.
The Hyundai Kona’s standard features include an 8-inch touchscreen, expandable to a 10-inch display, while the Mazda CX-30 includes advanced technology but at a higher price point. Notably, most Kona models have heated seats as standard equipment, contrasting with the CX-30’s offering, where heated seats are available only in higher trims.
| Feature | Mazda CX-30 | Hyundai Kona |
|---|---|---|
| Engine Power | 250 hp, 320 lb-ft | 195 hp, 195 lb-ft |
| 0-60 MPH Acceleration | 5.8 seconds | 6.6 seconds |
| Fuel Economy (Combined) | 25 MPG (Turbo), 26 MPG (Naturally Aspirated) | 32 MPG (FWD), 29 MPG (AWD) |
| Interior Cargo Space | 20 cubic feet | Not specified |
| Standard Touchscreen Size | Varies with trim | 8-inch (10-inch optional) |
| Heated Seats | Higher trims only | Most models |
Similar Models to Mazda CX-30
For consumers exploring options in the compact crossover market, models like Mazda CX-30 represent a compelling choice. Several crossover alternatives provide comparable features and performance, appealing to various preferences and needs.
- Kia Seltos: With a base engine producing 146 horsepower, the Seltos offers a spacious interior and robust technology. However, its safety features are not standard on base trim, requiring a higher investment for comprehensive security.
- Hyundai Kona: This model starts with a 147 horsepower engine and provides a sporty feel. While slightly less cargo space at approximately 19 cubic feet is a downside, the Kona’s features appeal to active lifestyles. Standard all-wheel drive isn’t available on all trims, distinguishing it from the Mazda CX-30.
- Subaru Crosstrek: Available with two engine options, the Crosstrek offers diverse performance. The base 2.0-liter engine generates 152 horsepower, while the more powerful 2.5-liter version produces 182 horsepower. Despite its advantages in off-road capabilities, its infotainment screen options range up to 8.0 inches, which trails behind the CX-30’s 8.8-inch display.
- Honda HR-V: The HR-V is equipped with a standard engine rated at 158 horsepower. While it provides a decent balance of features, its entry trim sound system—with just four speakers—falls short compared to the Mazda CX-30’s 8-speaker system. The HR-V also lacks the standout performance specifications found in the CX-30 lineup.
These similar vehicles, including the Kia Seltos, Hyundai Kona, Subaru Crosstrek, and Honda HR-V, present viable crossover alternatives, each with strengths and limitations to consider when choosing a suitable model for individual driving needs.
Mazda CX-30 vs. Honda HR-V: Monitored Performance
The Mazda CX-30 and Honda HR-V serve as strong competitors within the compact crossover market. A closer look at their specifications unveils key distinctions, particularly regarding cargo space and passenger comfort. This Mazda CX-30 Honda HR-V comparison highlights both vehicles’ strengths and weaknesses, aiding potential buyers in their decision-making process.
Comparison of Cargo and Passenger Space
Evaluating the cargo capabilities and interior dimensions is essential when considering both models. The Honda HR-V outperforms the Mazda CX-30 in terms of cargo space, providing extra room for flexible storage. While the HR-V offers 24.4 cubic feet of cargo space with the seats up and 55.1 cubic feet with the seats down, the CX-30 accommodates 20.2 cubic feet and 45.2 cubic feet, respectively. Passengers also benefit from the HR-V’s larger overall volume, offering 98.7 cubic feet compared to the CX-30’s 94.1 cubic feet.
To further illustrate the differences, the comparison table below outlines the relevant specifications:
| Specification | Mazda CX-30 | Honda HR-V |
|---|---|---|
| Cargo Space (Seats Up) | 20.2 cubic feet | 24.4 cubic feet |
| Cargo Space (Seats Down) | 45.2 cubic feet | 55.1 cubic feet |
| Passenger Volume | 94.1 cubic feet | 98.7 cubic feet |
| Overall Length | 173.0 inches | 179.8 inches |
| Overall Width | 70.7 inches | 72.4 inches |
| Overall Height | 61.7 inches | 63.4 inches |
| Wheelbase | 104.5 inches | 104.5 inches |
In terms of passenger comfort, both vehicles can seat five passengers, yet the CX-30 provides enhanced front headroom and legroom due to its design. Buyers seeking a blend of performance, luxury, and practicality may lean toward the Mazda CX-30, while those prioritizing max cargo space might find the Honda HR-V more appealing.
Notable Alternatives: Mazda CX-30 vs. Toyota Highlander
The Mazda CX-30 and Toyota Highlander serve different segments of the SUV market, appealing to distinct buyer preferences. The Mazda CX-30 emphasizes a sporty driving experience with upscale interior finishes, making it an attractive choice for individuals prioritizing style and agility in a compact SUV. In contrast, the Toyota Highlander caters to families seeking spacious vehicles, offering a three-row seating arrangement to comfortably accommodate larger groups.
This Mazda CX-30 Toyota Highlander comparison highlights the key differences that influence consumer decisions. While the Mazda CX-30 presents a refined design and dynamic handling, the Toyota Highlander focuses on functionality and space, accommodating the needs of families and group travel. Buyers needing extra room for passengers and cargo may find the Highlander’s design more appealing, particularly with its ample headroom and legroom across all three rows.
When considering family SUVs, the Highlander stands out with its robust safety features, impressive technology options, and extensive electrified lineup, which includes hybrids and plug-in hybrid models. In contrast, Mazda is expanding its plug-in hybrid offerings but lacks the same breadth of electrification found in Toyota’s robust lineup.
| Feature | Mazda CX-30 | Toyota Highlander |
|---|---|---|
| Seating Capacity | 5 | 7 or 8 |
| Cargo Space (behind 1st row) | 45.2 cu ft | 84.3 cu ft |
| Fuel Economy (City/HWY) | 24/31 mpg | 21/29 mpg (Hybrid averages may vary) |
| Infotainment System | Adaptive Mazda Connect | Apple CarPlay and Android Auto |
| Standard Safety Features | i-Activsense | Toyota Safety Sense 2.5+ |
In summary, while the Mazda CX-30 and Toyota Highlander serve different purposes within the SUV market, understanding the nuances of this Mazda CX-30 Toyota Highlander comparison can help buyers make informed choices that align with their lifestyle and needs. Each vehicle offers unique advantages that cater to different segments, making the choice significantly dependent on individual preferences regarding space, style, and practicality.
Exploring Other Rivals: Kia Seltos and Nissan Kicks
The SUV market continues to expand, offering nearly 20 subcompact SUVs and crossovers in the USA. Among these, the Mazda CX-30 rival analysis highlights the Kia Seltos and Nissan Kicks as notable alternatives. Each vehicle brings unique strengths and weaknesses into the competitive landscape.
The Kia Seltos excels in technology and interior space. Its potential to hold up to five passengers with ample head and legroom makes it a favorite for families. Additionally, the Seltos produces 146 horsepower and 132 lb-ft of torque, allowing for a spirited drive while maintaining efficiency.
On the other hand, the Nissan Kicks stands out for its affordability and fuel economy. Priced between $21,830 and $27,680, it presents consumers with a budget-friendly entry into the subcompact SUV market. The Kicks is powered by a 2.0-liter NA four-cylinder engine, delivering 141 horsepower and 140 lb-ft of torque. With a curb weight ranging from 2,987 to 4,211 lbs, its performance remains respectable considering its price point.
- The Kicks offers up to 30 cubic feet of trunk space, accommodating everyday cargo needs.
- Standard features include Nissan Safety Shield, with Automatic Emergency Braking and Rear Automatic Braking included across all models.
- For tech enthusiasts, the base model features a seven-inch touchscreen display, with options for Apple CarPlay and Android Auto in mid-range and top-tier models.
Despite these appealing aspects, the Kicks may not align with drivers seeking performance and luxury. The Mazda CX-30 outshines the Nissan Kicks with its refined driving experience and upscale interior when equipped with a turbocharged engine, often exceeding a price of $30,000. This makes the Mazda CX-30 a more compelling choice for those prioritizing these features in their compact crossover.
| Model | Engine | Horsepower | Torque | Starting Price | Trunk Space |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kia Seltos | 2.0L I4 | 146 hp | 132 lb-ft | Estimated from $23,000 | Up to 62.8 cubic feet |
| Nissan Kicks | 2.0L I4 | 141 hp | 140 lb-ft | $21,830 – $27,680 | 30 cubic feet |
| Mazda CX-30 | 2.5L I4 (Turbo Option) | 191 hp | 186 lb-ft | Starting at $30,000 | 20.2 cubic feet |
In the final analysis, those considering the Kia Seltos or Nissan Kicks alternatives should weigh what features matter most. While both alternatives offer distinct advantages, the Mazda CX-30 inevitably leads when it comes to performance and luxury qualities.
Evaluating Performance: Mazda CX-30 vs. Ford Bronco
The Mazda CX-30 and Ford Bronco represent two distinct approaches within the compact SUV market. The Mazda CX-30 offers an upscale interior and excellent driving abilities, appealing to urban drivers who prioritize refinement. In contrast, the Ford Bronco delivers powerful performance and impressive off-road capabilities, crucial for adventure enthusiasts.
In this Mazda CX-30 Ford Bronco comparison, the performance analysis reveals significant differences in engine output and handling characteristics. The Ford Bronco features a turbocharged 2.3-liter V-6 engine, generating 300 horsepower. This power translates into robust off-road capabilities, making it suitable for tackling rugged terrain and challenging conditions.
On the other hand, the Mazda CX-30 is designed for agility and responsiveness on paved roads, with a more modest horsepower output focused on refined handling. Drivers can expect a sporty driving experience, complemented by responsive steering and a smooth ride.
When considering off-road capabilities, the Ford Bronco’s design allows for enhanced traction and stability, supported by advanced suspension systems. The Mazda CX-30, while offering a capable performance on varied surfaces, falls short in true off-road experiences compared to the Bronco. In essence, the choice between these two vehicles often hinges on lifestyle and driving preferences.
| Feature | Mazda CX-30 | Ford Bronco |
|---|---|---|
| Engine Output | 187 horsepower (standard version) | 300 horsepower |
| 0-60 mph Acceleration | 6.8 seconds | Performance varies, typically slower on-road |
| Off-Road Capabilities | Moderate | Excellent |
| Starting Price | Approximately $23,000 | $39,130 |
| Towing Capacity | Not suitable for heavy towing | Up to 3,500 pounds |
Conclusion
As we wrap up our analysis, it’s clear that the Mazda CX-30 stands out in a competitive landscape of compact SUVs in 2025. The vehicle’s combination of style, performance, and advanced technology makes it a strong contender among its peers. With its base engine delivering 186 horsepower, and the turbocharged variant providing up to 250 horsepower, the CX-30 offers a dynamic driving experience that appeals to a wide range of consumers.
While evaluating the summary Mazda CX-30 competition, it’s essential to recognize the strengths of contenders like the Subaru Crosstrek and Hyundai Kona, which also offer robust features and reliability ratings. Each of these models has unique offerings that might attract different buyers, thus serving as viable alternatives for those exploring crossover SUV recommendations. Understanding these comparisons can greatly benefit consumers in their buying decision guide process.
Ultimately, the Mazda CX-30 represents a compelling option for those seeking a compact crossover that excels in both performance and safety. By considering the strengths and weaknesses discussed, potential buyers can make informed choices that align with their lifestyles and preferences. Whether one opts for the CX-30 or another noteworthy model, the key is to match the vehicle’s attributes to personal needs and priorities.
